tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8489363879633129568.post8021913264581015916..comments2023-11-13T11:54:56.769-08:00Comments on DePaolo's World: Just Apply The Law LiterallyAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02446191842560064784noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8489363879633129568.post-67432325873787910292013-11-16T06:01:10.610-08:002013-11-16T06:01:10.610-08:00You will love this one David;
Tiburzi Chiropractic...You will love this one David;<br />Tiburzi Chiropractic v. Kline, 2013 IL App (4th) 121113<br /><br />In a chiropractor’s small claims action to collect for services provided to<br />treat defendant’s work-related injury, the trial court erred in awarding<br />plaintiff a judgment, since defendant had filed a workers’ compensation<br />claim and the chiropractor’s bill, as conformed to the fee schedule set<br />forth in the workers’ compensation statute, was paid pursuant to the<br />settlement contract lump-sum petition and order in defendant’s workers’<br />compensation case, and although the amount paid was less than the<br />amount the chiropractor sought from defendant, the chiropractor was not<br />entitled to recover the balance of its bill from defendant, but the judgment<br />was modified to allow the chiropractor to recover for items supplied by<br />the chiropractor that were not compensable under the Act.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16920341324485654481noreply@blogger.com