tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8489363879633129568.post6239067671172429877..comments2023-11-13T11:54:56.769-08:00Comments on DePaolo's World: This Ain't Gonna WorkAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02446191842560064784noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8489363879633129568.post-67950774150479428852013-10-31T09:54:18.698-07:002013-10-31T09:54:18.698-07:00OGILVIE (upon which the law is based, which the Le...OGILVIE (upon which the law is based, which the Legislature previously did with HOFFMEISTER), only dealt with earnings prior to the injury, because it was a Work Comp case.<br /><br />For Rand to try to assess income from sources that the Injured may have had prior to the injury, is not only trying to make it more difficult, but also trying to rewrite both the determination of the Court, but also rewrite the law.<br /><br />If you don't like everybody getting "a fair and equal" share, then just re-think the premise of what constitutes"disproportionate." But don't send it back to Rand. Why give them another $ 500,000?<br /><br />In fact, why not make them pay back the fee for this mistake of trying to re-write the law?<br /><br />Of course, this is something that should actually be taken up by the Court, or the Legislature to define the term, but the Court has to wait for a case, and the Legislate would rather have CHSWC spend money so that they can lay the blame on others when nothing gets accomplished.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03913887497430014121noreply@blogger.com